NCGA - North Carolina General Assembly
Full Site Search:
Search Bill Text:
Find a Bill:
View Member Info:
House Member Vote Statistics
2007-2008 Session

District Name Total Votes Eligible Votes Actual Votes Vote % With Majority With Majority % Against Majority Against Majority %
107 Alexander, K. (D) 1902 491 480 97.8% 460 95.8% 20 4.2%
106 Alexander, M. (D) 1902 1805 1804 99.9% 1745 96.7% 59 3.3%
90 Harrell, J. (D) 1902 1680 1628 96.9% 1588 97.5% 40 2.5%
41 Harrell, T. (D) 1902 1898 1888 99.5% 1845 97.7% 43 2.3%
8 Warren, E. (D) 1902 1758 1747 99.4% 1718 98.3% 29 1.7%
88 Warren, R. (D) 1902 1902 1877 98.7% 1845 98.3% 32 1.7%
58 Adams (D) 1902 1868 1850 99.0% 1804 97.5% 46 2.5%
49 Allen (D) 1902 1899 1894 99.7% 1850 97.7% 44 2.3%
64 Allred (R) 1902 1902 1866 98.1% 1545 82.8% 321 17.2%
67 Almond (R) 1902 866 860 99.3% 754 87.7% 106 12.3%
40 Avila (R) 1902 1901 1872 98.5% 1621 86.6% 251 13.4%
82 Barnhart (R) 1902 1710 1704 99.6% 1559 91.5% 145 8.5%
21 Bell (D) 1902 1874 1856 99.0% 1818 98.0% 38 2.0%
100 Black (D) 1902 4 2 50.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0%
68 Blackwood (R) 1902 1900 1886 99.3% 1580 83.8% 306 16.2%
33 Blue (D) 1902 1824 1654 90.7% 1607 97.2% 47 2.8%
62 Blust (R) 1902 1902 1895 99.6% 1558 82.2% 337 17.8%
63 Bordsen (D) 1902 1491 1486 99.7% 1436 96.6% 50 3.4%
52 Boylan (R) 1902 1789 1785 99.8% 1544 86.5% 241 13.5%
10 Braxton (D) 1902 1894 1868 98.6% 1803 96.5% 65 3.5%
22 Brisson (D) 1902 1863 1809 97.1% 1748 96.6% 61 3.4%
73 Brown (R) 1902 1798 1771 98.5% 1486 83.9% 285 16.1%
78 Brubaker (R) 1902 1589 1561 98.2% 1405 90.0% 156 10.0%
7 Bryant (D) 1902 1899 1878 98.9% 1817 96.8% 61 3.2%
102 Carney (D) 1902 1896 1894 99.9% 1856 98.0% 38 2.0%
86 Church (D) 1902 1763 1681 95.3% 1646 97.9% 35 2.1%
110 Clary (R) 1902 1804 1792 99.3% 1646 91.9% 146 8.1%
14 Cleveland (R) 1902 1902 1891 99.4% 1512 80.0% 379 20.0%
77 Coates (D) 1902 1891 1885 99.7% 1845 97.9% 40 2.1%
65 Cole (D) 1902 1840 1782 96.8% 1724 96.7% 58 3.3%
39 Coleman (D) 1902 1881 1866 99.2% 1819 97.5% 47 2.5%
100 Cotham (D) 1902 1836 1834 99.9% 1795 97.9% 39 2.1%
32 Crawford (D) 1902 1887 1799 95.3% 1755 97.6% 44 2.4%
107 Cunningham (D) 1902 1374 1305 95.0% 1279 98.0% 26 2.0%
109 Current (R) 1902 1714 1704 99.4% 1571 92.2% 133 7.8%
25 Daughtridge (R) 1902 1729 1722 99.6% 1553 90.2% 169 9.8%
26 Daughtry (R) 1902 1770 1658 93.7% 1499 90.4% 159 9.6%
44 Dickson (D) 1902 1842 1841 99.9% 1800 97.8% 41 2.2%
80 Dockham (R) 1902 1785 1762 98.7% 1617 91.8% 145 8.2%
36 Dollar (R) 1902 1902 1902 100.0% 1643 86.4% 259 13.6%
101 Earle (D) 1902 1689 1601 94.8% 1550 96.8% 51 3.2%
112 England (D) 1902 1898 1883 99.2% 1853 98.4% 30 1.6%
50 Faison (D) 1902 1842 1823 99.0% 1782 97.8% 41 2.2%
24 Farmer-Butterfield (D) 1902 1729 1697 98.1% 1646 97.0% 51 3.0%
114 Fisher (D) 1902 1873 1871 99.9% 1805 96.5% 66 3.5%
74 Folwell (R)* 1902 1827 1823 99.8% 1476 81.0% 347 19.0%
84 Frye (R) 1902 1902 1902 100.0% 1620 85.2% 282 14.8%
67 Furr (R) 1902 390 381 97.7% 347 91.1% 34 8.9%
69 Gibson (D) 1902 1858 1836 98.8% 1802 98.1% 34 1.9%
85 Gillespie (R) 1902 1811 1802 99.5% 1534 85.1% 268 14.9%
45 Glazier (D) 1902 1715 1696 98.9% 1663 98.1% 33 1.9%
115 Goforth (D) 1902 1861 1855 99.7% 1805 97.3% 50 2.7%
66 Goodwin (D) 1902 1879 1866 99.3% 1817 97.4% 49 2.6%
15 Grady (R) 1902 1863 1860 99.8% 1721 92.5% 139 7.5%
103 Gulley (R) 1902 1898 1895 99.8% 1689 89.1% 206 10.9%
54 Hackney (D) 1902 1892 53 2.8% 53 100.0% 0 0.0%
119 Haire (D) 1902 1819 1800 99.0% 1733 96.3% 67 3.7%
29 Hall (D) 1902 1897 1870 98.6% 1810 96.8% 60 3.2%
57 Harrison (D) 1902 1872 1870 99.9% 1779 95.1% 91 4.9%
20 Hill (D) 1902 1898 1874 98.7% 1814 96.8% 60 3.2%
96 Hilton (R) 1902 1801 1795 99.7% 1468 81.8% 327 18.2%
81 Holliman (D) 1902 1871 1836 98.1% 1805 98.3% 31 1.7%
91 Holloway (R) 1902 1902 1890 99.4% 1544 81.7% 346 18.3%
92 Holmes (R) 1902 1667 1468 88.1% 1322 90.1% 146 9.9%
79 Howard (R) 1902 1612 1587 98.4% 1461 92.1% 126 7.9%
18 Hughes (D) 1902 497 490 98.6% 473 96.5% 17 3.5%
5 Hunter (D) 1902 0 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
70 Hurley (R) 1902 1902 1894 99.6% 1710 90.3% 184 9.7%
56 Insko (D) 1902 1869 1802 96.4% 1720 95.4% 82 4.6%
59 Jeffus (D) 1902 1885 1877 99.6% 1834 97.7% 43 2.3%
83 Johnson (R) 1902 1755 1716 97.8% 1563 91.1% 153 8.9%
60 Jones (D) 1902 1829 1766 96.6% 1710 96.8% 56 3.2%
7 Jones, Ed (D) 1902 0 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 Justice (R) 1902 1881 1875 99.7% 1752 93.4% 123 6.6%
117 Justus (R) 1902 1894 1885 99.5% 1713 90.9% 172 9.1%
105 Killian (R) 1902 1829 1819 99.5% 1521 83.6% 298 16.4%
97 Kiser (R) 1902 1892 1856 98.1% 1639 88.3% 217 11.7%
28 Langdon (R) 1902 1884 1878 99.7% 1687 89.8% 191 10.2%
53 Lewis (R) 1902 1736 1719 99.0% 1541 89.6% 178 10.4%
51 Love (D) 1902 1888 1850 98.0% 1811 97.9% 39 2.1%
42 Lucas (D) 1902 1868 1860 99.6% 1821 97.9% 39 2.1%
30 Luebke (D) 1902 1771 1728 97.6% 1623 93.9% 105 6.1%
34 Martin (D) 1902 1857 1854 99.8% 1814 97.8% 40 2.2%
43 McAllister (D) 1902 1872 1705 91.1% 1657 97.2% 48 2.8%
19 McComas (R) 1902 1836 1805 98.3% 1658 91.9% 147 8.1%
13 McElraft (R) 1902 1813 1791 98.8% 1626 90.8% 165 9.2%
75 McGee (R) 1902 1893 1877 99.2% 1699 90.5% 178 9.5%
9 McLawhorn (D) 1902 1854 1848 99.7% 1803 97.6% 45 2.4%
31 Michaux (D) 1902 1887 1689 89.5% 1625 96.2% 64 3.8%
5 Mobley (D) 1902 1878 1873 99.7% 1830 97.7% 43 2.3%
111 Moore (R) 1902 1864 1856 99.6% 1589 85.6% 267 14.4%
108 Neumann (R) 1902 1781 1776 99.7% 1601 90.1% 175 9.9%
1 Owens (D) 1902 1902 1902 100.0% 1858 97.7% 44 2.3%
72 Parmon (D) 1902 1649 1588 96.3% 1549 97.5% 39 2.5%
11 Pate (R) 1902 1729 1727 99.9% 1570 90.9% 157 9.1%
48 Pierce (D) 1902 1872 1866 99.7% 1836 98.4% 30 1.6%
118 Rapp (D) 1902 1892 1886 99.7% 1851 98.1% 35 1.9%
95 Ray (R) 1902 1711 1685 98.5% 1520 90.2% 165 9.8%
38 Ross (D) 1902 1863 1850 99.3% 1792 96.9% 58 3.1%
104 Samuelson (R) 1902 1706 1682 98.6% 1533 91.1% 149 8.9%
99 Saunders (D) 1902 1684 1597 94.8% 1559 97.6% 38 2.4%
89 Setzer (R) 1902 1845 1820 98.6% 1530 84.1% 290 15.9%
2 Spear (D) 1902 1886 1882 99.8% 1817 96.5% 65 3.5%
37 Stam (R) 1902 1870 1802 96.4% 1621 90.0% 181 10.0%
87 Starnes (R) 1902 1874 1843 98.3% 1622 88.0% 221 12.0%
76 Steen (R) 1902 1738 1727 99.4% 1571 91.0% 156 9.0%
17 Stiller (R) 1902 1835 1828 99.6% 1679 91.8% 149 8.2%
47 Sutton (D) 1902 1789 1708 95.5% 1616 94.6% 92 5.4%
93 Tarleton (D) 1902 1861 1855 99.7% 1831 98.7% 24 1.3%
116 Thomas (R) 1902 1791 1767 98.7% 1597 90.4% 170 9.6%
98 Tillis (R)* 1902 1771 1760 99.4% 1544 87.7% 216 12.3%
23 Tolson (D) 1902 1887 1880 99.6% 1838 97.8% 42 2.2%
4 Tucker (D) 1902 1863 1835 98.5% 1798 98.0% 37 2.0%
3 Underhill (D) 1902 1575 1564 99.3% 1531 97.9% 33 2.1%
12 Wainwright (D) 1902 1724 1711 99.2% 1680 98.2% 31 1.8%
113 Walend (R) 1902 1893 1886 99.6% 1724 91.4% 162 8.6%
94 Walker (R) 1902 1864 1859 99.7% 1686 90.7% 173 9.3%
35 Weiss (D) 1902 1886 1882 99.8% 1796 95.4% 86 4.6%
120 West (R) 1902 1813 1776 98.0% 1551 87.3% 225 12.7%
61 Wiley (R) 1902 1870 1867 99.8% 1603 85.9% 264 14.1%
55 Wilkins (D) 1902 1885 1869 99.2% 1835 98.2% 34 1.8%
6 Williams (D) 1902 1894 1867 98.6% 1818 97.4% 49 2.6%
71 Womble (D) 1902 1811 1793 99.0% 1750 97.6% 43 2.4%
27 Wray (D) 1902 1882 1881 99.9% 1854 98.6% 27 1.4%
18 Wright (D) 1902 1190 1156 97.1% 1125 97.3% 31 2.7%
46 Yongue (D) 1902 1887 1878 99.5% 1854 98.7% 24 1.3%

Data Last Updated: Sep 29 2008 10:59AM

Total Votes - The total number of roll call votes taken this session on the chamber floor.
Eligible Votes - The number of votes the member was eligible to vote on this session. This number does not include votes taken when the member had an excused absence or an excused vote.
Actual Votes - The number of actual votes the member cast on the chamber floor this session.
Vote % - The percentage of eligible votes this session on which the member voted.
With Majority - The number of times this session the member voted the same way as the outcome of the vote. If a specific vote passed and the member voted AYE, then that vote counted as WITH THE MAJORITY.
With Majority % - The With Majority votes divided by the Actual Votes.
Against Majority - The number of time this session the member voted opposite way as the outcome of the vote. If a specific vote failed and the member voted AYE, then that vote counted as AGAINST THE MAJORITY.
Against Majority % - The Against Majority votes divided by the Actual Votes.

* Presiding Officer

Speaker and Speaker Pro Tem often do not vote while presiding; therefore their voting % may be low.